Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Do you need a binutils patch at all? Why not do it in GCC like > Fedora did?
Because not everybody out there uses GCC, I guess. But I can start patching GCC, and then come later to ld if that's really needed. By the way, gcc trunk (and gcc-snapshot in Debian) have now that option to pass -Wl,--build-id to the linker by default if that's supported, see [1]. I built it with that option this weekend, will test that everything keeps working fine and attach a patch here. Cheers, Emilio [1] http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=rev&revision=147029
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
