On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 17:39 +0200, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
> From X, conspy 2 and 5 work as expected.

So, apart from the inexplicable vanishing act of /dev/vcsa1, everything
works as expected - yes?  Well, apart making the error message clearer.
The problem is the vcs device nodes were renamed at some stage, and
conspy tries both.

I will leave this as a bug to fix the error message.




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Reply via email to