Hello again, On 03/07/2009 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 03/07/09 at 04:17 +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote: > > On 02/07/2009 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > > if you take a look at debian/rules, there are several > > > > more commands in unpack-stamp than just the 'tar xfz'. According to your > > > > logfile, the build-arch-stamp and patch-stamp targets are executed in > > > > the middle of the unpack-stamp target. > > > > > > > > I'm unable to reproduce that bug in a clean amd64 debian/unstable > > > > pbuilder chroot. > > > > > > > > here's the relevant parts of debian/rules: > > > > [...] > > > > > > Actually, the relevant part is before that: > > > ifneq (,$(filter parallel=%,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS))) > > > NUMJOBS = $(patsubst parallel=%,%,$(filter > > > parallel=%,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS))) > > > MAKEFLAGS += -j$(NUMJOBS) > > > endif > > > > > > You seem to be missing some dependencies between your rules. > > > > ah, thanks for the hint. I hope to have fixed that now, could you give > > the packages at http://people.debian.org/~mejo/zope2.11/ give a try? > > Bah, if you just removed the lines about that, I would suggest uploading > it, since it's unlikely to break ;)
what I actually did, is trying to fix the dependencies of different targets. only issue that I don't know what to do about, is that the dpatch patch(-stamp) target would need to depend on the unpack(-stamp) target. but I don't know how to define that dependency, as the dpatch patch(-stamp) target isn't defined in debian/rules directly but rather in the dpatch include file /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make. greetings, jonas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
