Hi, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Rene Engelhard <r...@debian.org> [2009.06.24.1637 +0200]: > > Interesting. #396276 (because of which -no-oosplash was added to the > > *.mime files) explicitely mentions mutt as breaking when you just run > > soffice... > > What's the difference? Why would or should mutt even care?
Because mutt waits for the exit of the app and then deletes its tmp file. When OOo is started without -no-oosplash it returns too early -> tempfile gone -> OOo fails to open the file because it does not exist anymore. That's what #396276 was about. Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
