owner 317012 Alexander Gattin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> thanks Hi!
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 06:55:53AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > Marc Haber explained on IRC that the "-O" option adds a problem to > backport (on the other hand, this -O option actually exists since a > long time). > > As, in the same time, changing chage to have a special errorlevel does > not harm a lot And will cause the same problems for "backport",... Or I don't understabd something here? > and is judged by Marc as more pratical to use for hime, > I hereby decide that we will go that way. OK, I'm a bit sick and was offline whole day -- but I'll add chage patch and modify "-O" desc. a bit to more close with upstream. > -this patch has to be "ported" for upstream shadow We talked with Tomasz and he did not seem to implement dedicated exitcode for the matter, but I think he will accept an already-made patch. > -we upload a fixed version as soon as possible to give Marc a possible > solution for his own bug report Will try to do this quick. -- WBR, xrgtn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
