-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi.
Raphael Hertzog, 28.05.2009 09:21: > What is the timestamp of this file ? Here’s the output: > File: „/var/lib/dpkg/alternatives/x-terminal-emulator“ > Size: 501 Blocks: 8 IO Block: 4096 reguläre Datei > Device: 306h/774d Inode: 198025 Links: 1 > Access: (0644/-rw-r--r--) Uid: ( 0/ root) Gid: ( 0/ root) > Access: 2009-05-17 00:27:39.000000000 +0200 > Modify: 2009-05-17 00:27:39.000000000 +0200 > Change: 2009-05-17 00:27:39.000000000 +0200 > Can you check if that time correspond to the upgrade of some terminal > related package in /var/log/dpkg.log (or aptitude.log if you use it). There is only one package which comes suspiciously close to the timestamp above: xfce4-terminal. Just for the record, the lines in question are the following: > /var/log/dpkg.log:2009-05-17 00:26:43 upgrade xfce4-terminal 0.2.12-1 0.2.12-2 > /var/log/dpkg.log:2009-05-17 00:26:43 status half-configured xfce4-terminal > 0.2.12-1 > /var/log/dpkg.log:2009-05-17 00:26:43 status unpacked xfce4-terminal 0.2.12-1 > /var/log/dpkg.log:2009-05-17 00:26:43 status half-installed xfce4-terminal > 0.2.12-1 > /var/log/dpkg.log:2009-05-17 00:26:43 status half-installed xfce4-terminal > 0.2.12-1 > /var/log/dpkg.log:2009-05-17 00:26:43 status half-installed xfce4-terminal > 0.2.12-1 > /var/log/dpkg.log:2009-05-17 00:26:43 status half-installed xfce4-terminal > 0.2.12-1 > /var/log/dpkg.log:2009-05-17 00:26:43 status half-installed xfce4-terminal > 0.2.12-1 > /var/log/dpkg.log:2009-05-17 00:26:43 status half-installed xfce4-terminal > 0.2.12-1 > /var/log/dpkg.log:2009-05-17 00:26:44 status unpacked xfce4-terminal 0.2.12-2 > /var/log/dpkg.log:2009-05-17 00:26:44 status unpacked xfce4-terminal 0.2.12-2 > /var/log/dpkg.log:2009-05-17 00:27:39 configure xfce4-terminal 0.2.12-2 > 0.2.12-2 > /var/log/dpkg.log:2009-05-17 00:27:39 status unpacked xfce4-terminal 0.2.12-2 > /var/log/dpkg.log:2009-05-17 00:27:39 status half-configured xfce4-terminal > 0.2.12-2 > /var/log/dpkg.log:2009-05-17 00:27:39 status installed xfce4-terminal 0.2.12-2 As you can see in the last lines, this is more than close but plainly equal. > I don't know who/what called update-alternatives with > x-terminal-emulator.1.gz as master alternative but it's definitely not > a side-effect of proper usage of update-alternatives. Here’s the content of xfce4-terminal.postinst: > #!/bin/sh -e > > # install alternatives links > > if [ "$1" = "configure" ]; then > update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/x-terminal-emulator \ > x-terminal-emulator /usr/bin/xfce4-terminal.wrapper 40 \ > --slave /usr/share/man/man1/x-terminal-emulator.1.gz \ > x-terminal-emulator.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/xfce4-terminal.wrapper.1.gz > fi > > # Automatically added by dh_installmenu > if [ "$1" = "configure" ] && [ -x "`which update-menus 2>/dev/null`" ]; then > update-menus > fi > # End automatically added section > > > exit 0 Proper usage? Regards, Mathias - -- debian/rules -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkoeu/0ACgkQYfUFJ3ewsJgVjgCgnW5pHhUaJwdeOCVoxblgo573 qRcAn1G9MpNI+2GUu0JLrzMrTeX+XEkr =0OOF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
