Hi Franck: Thanks for the patch. It looks good. However, I'm wondering why you chose to use strncpy instead of strlcpy? If it's a portability issue, then perhaps it would be possible to detect if strlcpy is available on the system and fall back on strncpy otherwise?
It's probably not a big deal, but I do know that strlcpy is a bit better on performance. Cheers, Jonathan On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Franck Joncourt <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Could you check with the enclosed patch that it works fine. > > Thanks, > > -- > Franck Joncourt > http://debian.org - http://smhteam.info/wiki/ > > _______________________________________________ > pkg-perl-maintainers mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-perl-maintainers > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
