On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 06:09:18PM -0400, John W. Eaton wrote: > On 11-May-2009, Thomas Weber wrote: > > | On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:33:13PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > | > * Thomas Weber <[email protected]> [2009-05-11 20:25]: > | > > | > > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 04:24:04PM +0000, Debian Bug Tracking System > wrote: > | > > > Bug#528230: Error in Octaviz. > | > > > Warning: Unknown package 'octaviz.' > | > > > Bug reassigned from package `octaviz.' to `octaviz'. > | > > > | > > Okay, I guess the time has come to decide on Octaviz' future. Last time > | > > I tried, it didn't compile against VTK 5.2. > | > > | > Candidate for removal? > | > | Probably, yes. > | > | > There is a non-negligible amount of octaviz users, though: > | > http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=octaviz > | > | Then they should get up and get the software in shape. Yes, bad > | response, but what else should I say? We are just the messengers of the > | bad news. > > Before removing it, would you consider posting a message to the > [email protected] list asking whether anyone (or group) would like to > start maintaining it? Maybe the message should also go to the > [email protected] and [email protected] lists.
Done, to [email protected]. Thanks Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
