-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 12:48:21PM +0200, David Paleino wrote:
>On Sun, 10 May 2009 12:40:09 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>
>You know you should go and change your key, right? ;)

No, I do not know - is SHA1 to weak nowadays?  Any URL where I can read 
more on this?


>> Are you sure you do not want to help me maintain it?
>
>Yes, sorry :(
>I never fully used pinot, and I don't feel like maintaining something I 
>don't use :(

Ok.


>> I would really appreciate teaming up rather than being alone in it - 
>> I maintain 80+ packages already, so it is not like I am bored. :-)
>
>Heh, I know (I'm at ~40 packages :)

:-)


>You could always send a RFH though!.. pinot is a good piece of 
>software, I bet you'll find someone to team up with.

Never thought of RFH, but obvious now that you mention it.  I am on 
low-threshold-NMU list at our wiki already.  I will consider mass-filing 
RFH bugs for all packages.


>Good luck with pinot!

Thanks!


  - Jonas

- -- 
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkoGvs0ACgkQn7DbMsAkQLgX2wCeMWkWd4CmyrH6WwL/alEjw26V
aZ8AnRDtGsBegG5dmr9xcy2WrcnfsgdL
=n0qK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Reply via email to