On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 02:53:47PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > It doesn't seem reasonable that everyone else has to go our of their way to > > work around a bug in your gconf-2.m4. > > Currently, everybody seems to be happy with the dh_gconf solution.
Is that because everybody who didn't complain ... > If > you’re not, you’ll have to deal with it by hand. ... is assumed to be happy with unnecessary manual work? "everybody who didn't speak agrees with me" > fix one package. By > adding a single line to your rules file. I already fixed my package before filing this bug, which I only did with the naive idea that you would care about making life easier for other developers. Anyway, I already guessed why you don't want to fix this (see my other mail). The (guessed) explanation is somewhat satisfactory; what I find amusing is that you've been uncapable of telling me. -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
