On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 02:44:16PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 02:52:07PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > > > --- initramfs-tools-0.93.2/update-initramfs.orig 2009-04-20 > > > 14:50:15.000000000 -0600 > > > +++ initramfs-tools-0.93.2/update-initramfs 2009-04-20 > > > 14:50:28.000000000 -0600 > > > @@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ > > > run_lilo > > > return 0 > > > fi > > > - if [ -x /sbin/elilo ]; then > > > + if [ -x /usr/sbin/elilo ]; then > > > elilo > > > return 0 > > > fi > > > > Surely this should be if [ -x $(which elilo 2>/dev/null) ], since paths > > aren't supposed to be hard-coded in maintainer scripts at all? > thanks you both for the input will use > command -v elilo >/dev/null 2>&1 Is 'command -v' in SUSv3? 'which' is the predominant idiom used in maintainer scripts... -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [email protected] [email protected] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
