Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <t...@linux.thai.net> wrote: > FYI, I once posted to consult with debian-legal last year [1], > but have got no answer so far. So, I decide to prepare the > pacakge for non-free. > [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2008/07/msg00008.html
I suspect I didn't reply because I was avoiding the OFL-fu and didn't understand editing it could possibly change the postcard clause. > MJ Ray wrote: > > While not a DFSG problem, I think it's misleading to call this > > cooperative font creation when the sale restriction limits economic > > participation and the notification requirement means it is not > > autonomous. Compare http://www.ica.coop/coop/principles.html > > Well, it's the same restriction as found in DejaVu font, anyway: Quite possibly. It's trivial to avoid (so not a DFSG problem) but still a restriction on economic participation by font developers, so discourages cooperative font creation. [...] > >> WILL WORK AS EXPECTED OR WILL BE DEVELOPED FURTHUR IN ANY SPECIFIC WAY. > >> THERE > >> IS NO OFFER OR GUARANTEE OF TECHNICAL SUPPORT. > > > > Spelling error: further not furthur. > > Can I edit the license terms/disclaimers? Is it legal to do so? Not really. One should ask the licensor to fix it. I pointed it out because unfixed spelling errors are another hint that the licence hasn't been reviewed properly yet. Hope that explains, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
