On Sun, 29 Mar 2009, Alain Baeckeroot wrote: > Le 29/03/2009 à 21:28, maximilian attems écrit : > > > > if you would take 5 minutes checking the bug reports you would > > see that aboves bug is already reported and is tracked for > > the next 2.6.26 update. > I have checked but missed it, sorry to not be perfect :-)
#521420 [i|+| ] [linux-2.6] linux-2.6: SQLite performance regression http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=linux-2.6 > > concerning preempt and higher hz that is left for dicussion on > > debian kernel and seems out of topic here. > should i fill a new bug tagged "wish" for a linux-image-desktop ? > It _does_ really change the usability with big documents/mail no newer bug won't help, what is needed are benchmark test runs against higher HZ and one for PREEMPT. higher HZ should no longer matter since nohz, so it should be fine for server workloads too, but this needs to be shown. afais HZ_1000 is also the fedora default. -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
