On Mar 29, martin f krafft <[email protected]> wrote:

> also sprach Marco d'Itri <[email protected]> [2009.03.28.1904 +0100]:
> > > Just for my curiosity... does this statement belong to `udevsettle' only
> > > or to `udevadm settle' as well?
> > It's the same thing.
> So how should we wait for udev to complete what it's doing?
Almost everything can be converted to an asynchronous model where the
second part of the code is started by an udev RUN rule, which guarantees
the existence of the device.

Anyway, if you can't do better than using udevsettle please check for
both programs to not require conflicting with the old package.

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to