On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 09:18 -0400, Mike O'Connor wrote: > Sorry, in this case I was not talking about the kdelibs binary package, > but the kdelibs source package. I'm reassigning it. > > This is not just like code that could be compiled against openssl, in > that case, you aren't redistributing an unacceptable mix of licenses. > This is more like if you had GPL code that EMBEDDED a copy of openssl.
This doesn't make any sense to me. Debian distributes files under GPL and files under 4 clause BSD, and that's never been a problem, I don't see what them being in the same tarball would change, if at no point they're combined to form a derivative work. The GPL explicitly authorizes mere aggregation. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org