On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 06:44 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 09:00:25PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> > Package: lm-sensors
> > Version: 1:3.0.2-1+b2
> > Severity: normal
> > 
> > 
> > Subject: lm-sensors: ignore in sensors.conf has no effect on output of 
> > sensors or sensord
> > Package: lm-sensors
> > Version: 1:3.0.2-1+b2
> > Severity: normal
> > 
> > I added a bunch of ignore lines to my sensors.conf, but the ignored sensors 
> > are still
> > reported by sensors run on the command line and by sensord.
> > 
> > The docs do note that the ignore specification is only advisory, so I 
> > suppose it's possible
> > this is not a bug.  In that case, please consider this wishlist.  However, 
> > it seems
> > unlikely the basic apps are ignoring this.  It seems more likely I've 
> > misunderstood
> > something or there is a real bug.
> > 
> If you are using lm-sensors version 3, you should do the change to
> /etc/sensors3.conf. /etc/sensors.conf is for applications still using
> the old version of the library. 
> 
Thank you.  That works much better :)

Looking at the docs now, I see this info in there in several places.
sensord's README.Debian mentions sensors.conf only.

Many of the man pages mention sensor.conf and sensor3.conf.  They could
be a bit clearer that this is version 3.

Would it be possible not to create sensor.conf for new installs?  I have
a brand new Lenny system and added lm-sensors and sensord (and
dependencies and suggestions).  If this was all v3, why did it create
sensors.conf?  Actually, I'm assuming they created it; maybe it was
already there.

So, my problem is solved.  It might help others to tweak things to make
the use of sensor3 a bit clearer.

Thanks.

Ross




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Reply via email to