On Mar 13, Jan Christoph Nordholz <[email protected]> wrote:
> I've read #517954, and I'm getting these warnings myself, but the delay > is way below one second here. And did anyone notice a considerable delay > at all before the warnings appeared? The point is not the delays, but a useless file slowing every call to modprobe (which indeed is run a hundred times during bootup). This is minimal, but everything helps. > * As from my personal experience mt-st is mostly installed on headless > servers somewhere in a rack, the use cases of udev and mt-st couldn't be > more contrary. As from my personal experience, especially servers benefit from udev since it solves the problem of network interfaces and block devices changing their names at every reboot. > Or is there a plan to make udev strictly mandatory in the future? There is not exactly a plan, but it's mandatory for all relevant other distributions and more and more features require it. -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
