Paul Wise wrote: > On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 22:18 -0800, Dan Kaminsky wrote: > > >> libnet1 is terribly inappropriate for what I'm doing. >> > > libnet0 is what the Debian package (paketto 1.10) depends on, do you > know if libnet1 is a suitable replacement? > > It's not. >> Last I looked at libdnet, it was incomplete too for what paketto >> needs. I'll look around at the status of packet munging libraries. >> > > Does this mean you're still working on paketto 2.0? > > It means I would rather write Paketto 3.0 than see this dropped :)
Is it OK if I schedule this work for late march, early april? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
