Quoting Martin Bagge ([email protected]): > On Sat, 31 Jan 2009, Christian Perrier wrote: > >> Hmm, that file does not fit the last version of (rewritten) templates. > > Strange. I used the file at the debian.org tracker pages as base. > However, attached to this e-mail is a update towards the file you sent.
Then, this is logical. The review changed strings a lot....which explains why you should have used the file that was sent in the call for translations.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
