On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 00:06 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 07:01:58PM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote: > > Package: memtester > > Version: all > > > > Greetings, > > > > There is a licensing problem with the "memtester" package included in > > Debian. > > I tried to report this to the package maintainer, but your system reports > > the > > address is no longer valid. > > Hm, yes, I notice. > > > My software is licensed under /only/ version 2 of the GPL, but your package > > states the typical FSF "or any later version", which does not apply to any > > of > > my software. > > Ai, that's a serious mistake on part of the Debian maintainer for your > package. Please do accept our apologies for that.
Sorry for that. I will fix that ASAP. And sorry for the trouble with the email address - memtester hasn't changed for a long time, and I certainly would have changed it with the next upload. > It looks like the maintainer since has switched email addresses, as the > domain masqmail.cx is not working anymore. I'm cc'ing him on his > @debian.org address, and noting the issue for further tracking in case > nothing happens. I'm sorry it took a while to notice, typically a > mailinglist like debian-qa@lists.debian.org yields better response > times. > > Oliver, please update this package and dumpasn1 to your new email > address, and update those packages (and of course, fix this bug). Thanks for the heads up. I will fix it. Greetings, Oliver
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
