On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 12:59:13AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Your proposed patch is not an acceptable solution, however: The problem > lies in duplicated code: If a seurity bug is found in FCK then Debian > should need to path only once, not once per web app embedding FCK. > > So the challenge is to make MoinMoin use the separately packaged FCK.
My understanding is that it is not simply the same as upstream FCK; after all, if it were, wouldn't the solution be a simple matter of a dependency and few symlinks? The moinmoin FCK editor is a fork designed to operate on Moin wiki markup. As such, a number of HTML features are stripped out, and the remaining features work on a different language underneath. I would maintain this is not the same editor at all, but a fork, and that integration with the standard FCK editor is neither possible nor fruitful, since bugs with one would not necessarily impact the other. -- John > > Help with this is much appreciated. > > > Kind regards, > > - Jonas > > -- > * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt > * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ > > [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private > -- John Goerzen Author, Foundations of Python Network Programming http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1590593715 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
