On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 03:14:42PM +0100, Andreas Putzo wrote: > > About that, isn't that the case to follow josm versioning (i.e. svn release) > > instead of the timestamp-like version used currently ? > > My understanding is that this is more or less a matter of personal > preference. But josm now has a 'latest more or less stable' svn revision > which might be easier to distinguish than a timestamp-like version. >
That was my thought about version: allow a straight comparison with upstream status. -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
