Kai Hendry wrote: > Oh I noticed that the nostromo packaging fails to build on amd64. The > problem is something I forwarded upstream last month. However upstream > says Debian is doing it wrong! ;) > http://git.debian.org/?p=users/kai-guest/nostromo
Did they explain how to do it correctly? > So should there be a Debian patch for -Wall? Makes no sense to me. > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Marcus Glocker <mar...@nazgul.ch> > Date: Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 8:39 AM > Subject: Re: Thanks for nostromo-1.8.7.tar.gz > To: Kai Hendry <hen...@iki.fi> > > > On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 08:08:26PM +0000, Kai Hendry wrote: > > > ssh mar...@hetty.webconverger.com > > pass: nazgul > > > > Thanks! > > OK, I have found out that it seems off_t is defined as `long int' > instead `long long int'. IMO this is wrong, but I am no Linux/Debian > specialist. I haven't seen that problem with other Linux distris yet. I don't know to which line he's refering, but it shouldn't matter if the source code uses off_t, if it's a long or long long. Can someone explain this to me or point me to the relevant file and line? > You can make a simple workaround by removing the compiler option > `-Wall' in nostromo/src/nhttpd/GNUmakefile from CCFLAGS, then it > should compile. Sounds wrong to me since -Wall just displays warning messages. I think the error will persist, but is not reported and therefore the source code compiles. > Regards, > Marcus > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, send mail to 493645-unsubscr...@bugs.debian.org. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
