On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 11:14:02AM +0100, Marc Olzheim wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 10:45:53AM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > I don't think what you are seeing is leaks but memory fragmentation.
> > libc after sarge got really bad with the workload Tor put on its malloc.
> 
> That sounds plausible as well.
> 
> > Do you want to give the current alpha version a try and let me know if
> > it helps?  IIRC it reduced memory usage quite some.
> > My packages are in experimental if you are running sid, or you can use
> > the backports I put up on mirror.noreply.org as described on
> > https://wiki.torproject.org/noreply/TheOnionRouter/TorOnDebian
> > (You want one of the -experimental repositories)
> 
> Ok, I installed tor (0.2.1.7-alpha-2~lenny+1) now, I'll wait and see
> what happens, thanks so far :)

Ok, that looks a whole lot better. It still grows a bit, but so slow
that that can easily be explained by the usual memory fragmentation.

Thanks again. :)

Marc



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Reply via email to