On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 08:19:25PM +0100, Steffen Joeris wrote:
> I had a read through the issue and to me it sounds like pristine-tar is
> broken
> or at least expects the perl-module to work, where it IMHO should have never
> worked. I am wondering how many packages are affecting by this or assuming
> this behaviour.
> Could you build updated packages and give them to Joeyh and Stefano (both
> CC'ed now, pasting an URL to the bugreports would be best I guess). It would
> be great, if they could do some more extensive testing in their environments.
> I'll have a more careful read through the issue during the next days.
I'm not worried about pristine-tar (which is why I didn't cc Joeyh and
Stefano originally): it's not in Etch at all, and the original report
was about the sid/lenny Perl 5.10 branch.
I'm worried that I have introduced the same incompatibility into Etch by
rewriting File::Path::rmtree() into a similar version as the one in Lenny.
That's why I reused #479317; sorry if that caused confusion.
I don't know how many packages (if any) are affected. The ytnef bug
(#507890) is the only user report of a regression that I'm aware of,
and it's not quite clear if it's about the same issue. Given that
/usr/bin/ytnef-filter uses
tempdir("ytnefXXXX", TMPDIR => 1, CLEANUP => 1);
that seems likely.
Sorry if I've jumped the gun prematurely.
--
Niko Tyni [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
