On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:15:30PM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote: > * Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-29 18:29-0500]: > > Looking at what's started at 20 on my local system, I can't see anything > > that Puppet explicitly depends on, so if it's causing anyone any hassle > > where it is, I'd say pull it and start it at 20. > > I actually think that the original bug submitter is wanting it started > *later*, not earlier. However, I am not seeing how this is something > that is related to sysv-init and should be handled in a way outside of > this system. Especially since networking should be up by runlevel 2 S20 > (unless someone has some asynchronous networking situation such as > network manager, dhcp or something else going on...)
ifup on my machine waits until DHCP has acquired a lease before continuing, presumably to stop this very scenario. If NetworkManager does things differently, then it's stupider than I thought (and I already think pretty poorly of it). I think the submitter needs to do more diagnostics on their system; it's pretty obvious that they're running or doing something non-standard or not recommended. - Matt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
