Some additional info that might be useful to verify that the binNMU did the trick.
Best, Michael ----- Forwarded message from "Roepke, Heiko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----- Subject: AW: Re: [Pkg-clamav-devel] Need Help: Reported bug in packageDansGuardian may be am clamav bug Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 08:04:28 +0100 From: "Roepke, Heiko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Michael Tautschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hi, No, but a guy on the net has a recently updated list of some bad pdf´s: http://www3.malekal.com/pdf.txt We´ve dowloaded them all, and none of them was marked as infected via plugin. A command-line scan found more than 30 infected files. Heiko -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Michael Tautschnig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Freitag, 28. November 2008 17:00 An: Roepke, Heiko Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: [Pkg-clamav-devel] Need Help: Reported bug in packageDansGuardian may be am clamav bug > Dear ClamAV Support Team, > > I recently reported a bug with AntiVirus Scanning in the package > DansGuardian, but maybe it is a "bug" in clamav. > I am using the plugin "clamav" in DG witch is imlemented via libclamav (as > far as i know!). > > May someone have a look at my bug report? THANX in advance! > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=506753 > > Do you have access to some web server to give the "real" URL, like http://$server/virus.pdf instead of some redirect? Best, Michael ----- End forwarded message -----
pgpuvZc1kcLlJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
