tag 492718 +moreinfo
thanks

I've tested this problem and am having trouble coming up with a
reproducable case. If you can come up with a way for me to reproduce the
problem, I can push this upstream, but until I can also do it, I'm not
able to convince them its a problem.

It sounds like this is probably a fact caching issue, where the hostname
cached doesn't match the name found for the Node. You should be able to
look in :yamldir/facts and :yamldir/nodes and see data for the same node
under different names (e.g., fully qualified and unqaulified).

According to upstream, this definitely shouldn't happen in 0.24.5, and
if we can come up with a case where we can replicate it, then we are
likely to get a quick resolution.

micah

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to