Hello,
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Vincent Fourmond wrote:
>> openoffice.org-core really should not conflict with
>> cacao-oj6-jre. Both packages are destined to have a wide audience, and
>
> cacao-oj6-jre is? There is openjdk (and it's not that slow as people
> suggest FME).
cacao-oj6 is better in some respects (in particular fonts: default
fonts in openjdk are ugly and unreadable, which is not the case for
cacao-oj6).
> And cacao-oj6-jre (is at least in sid) Priority: extra anyway.
> Citing from the policy:
> "extra
>
> This contains all packages that conflict with others with required,
> important, standard or optional priorities, or are only likely to be useful
> if you already know what they are or have specialized requirements."
This is why I did not file a serious/important bug report.
>> the conflict is an extreme measure. Isn't it just possible to
>> blacklist cacao-oj6-jre somehow, if openoffice crashes with it ? It is
>
> Maybe (although I currently don't know how/whether that can be achieved,
> cacao-oj6-jre has - of course - a openjdk-like structure). OOo would need
> to parse its info...
>
> But the correct fix (imho) is to fix cacao-oj6-jre.
I also agree with that.
About the fact that cacao-oj6 will not make it to testing, I agree.
However, I wanted to file that bug report so it can be remembered and
fixed when it is possible. I didn't expect you to change that soon.
Regards,
Vincent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
