Hello Boian, Sorry for the late, I've forgotten ..
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 12:40:57AM +0300, Boian Bonev wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 02:13:14AM +0000, Boian Bonev wrote: > > > > Can you check you are using the very last version of anonftpsync ? > > http://www.debian.org/mirror/anonftpsync > > yes i downloaded it from debian.org 2 days ago We have a brand new sync script : http://lists.debian.org/debian-mirrors-announce/2008/11/msg00001.html (If you are subscribed to http://lists.debian.org/debian-mirrors-announce you should have received it). > >> Archive-upstream: debian.proxad.net > > > > hurd-i386 is not yet updated on ftp.bg.debian.org, but once this is > > done, that may be better to mirror from a closer/faster server (for > > example ftp.hu.debian.org or ftp.ro.debian.org) hurd-i386 available on ftp.bg.d.o > > BTW, it gives us (the mirror team) a clearer view of the mirrors > > dependancy. > > it may be geographically closer, but i get better bandwidth from > there. i preffer to download from france or germany - it is closer and > faster. e.g. the links to Romania which is next to us go to Frankfurt > and back... It that still the case ? If yes, do you think this routing issue can be solved ? If there is a performance issue with ftp.bg.d.o, let's fix it or change ftp.bg.d.o The point here is that 30 min more of sync duration is not that a problem if it allows us to have a clear view of mirrors tree dependancy. Obviously, if mirroring from ftp.bg.d.o means 1hour or more than ftp.de.d.o, then fix the routing or change to ftp.de/fr.d.o [...] > >> local loop is unlimited > > How much is "unlimited" ? :) > > 1Gbps ? Let's write 1Gbps Best regards, -- Simon Paillard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
