tag 405862 pending
thanks

Hamish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (01/09/2008):
> Regardless of the depends/suggests status of autopano-sift, could the
> primary subject of this bug report be addressed please?

Sure, that's why I left the bug open.

BTW, that might be a bit confusing. The Subject refers to “should be
autopano” while the following is about “autopanog”:
> i.e. a tiny patch to remove the '.exe' from autopanog default command?
                                              ^^^^^^^^^
> or, in the ~/.hugin file edit this line:
> [AutoPanoSift]
> AutopanoExe=autopanog
              ^^^^^^^^^

I'm on my way to see what is available in those packages anyway…

Mraw,
KiBi.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to