On Tue, 11 November 2008 21:13:28 +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 02:15:29PM +0000, Jörn Engel wrote: > > > > Then the short-term solution for debian is clear. Simply rebuild the > > package and add a dependency on a specific gcc version. > > Which sucks badly because the default gcc is not always the same on > every arch, and more importantly, people may want to use different GCCs. > It would look like a better idea to ask gcc for its include path > properly.
Maybe not even that. It is conceivable to want sparse on systems that don't even have gcc installed. The BSDs seem to favor pcc lately. So the preferred long-term solution would be for sparse to ship its own headers. Jörn -- To recognize individual spam features you have to try to get into the mind of the spammer, and frankly I want to spend as little time inside the minds of spammers as possible. -- Paul Graham -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
