Am Donnerstag, den 09.10.2008, 08:48 +0200 schrieb Rafael Laboissiere: > * Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-10-08 23:22]: > > > Hmm, if you want to experiment, there's a 3.1.51 package right there > > (look for octave3.1). > > > > No bug reports on that one, please :) It's just a development snapshot. > > I do not see a problem in filing bug reports against the version in > experimental.
This wasn't meant seriously. Then again, the 3.1 branch develops that fast that the first action would be to check the current tip for the bug. > It is actually good for us that users detect problems before > the package migrates to unstable. BTW, there is even a tag "experimental" > that is recognized by the BTS [1]. > > [1] http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#tags Yes, but that tag's meaning changed: experimental This bug should not be archived until it is fixed in experimental. I don't think we care too much whether a bug that's fixed in unstable is also fixed in experimental. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
