Hi, [CC'ing my sponsor]
On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 07:56:59PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > Hi > > Please backport the fix for this bug to lenny and upload to > testing-proposed-updates, TIA. > > If you think it's not possible to backport the fix and it would be > better to remove fsl and fslview from lenny, please let me know. I don't think that it is necessary to remove fsl from the archive. Actually, all RC bugs present in the lenny version (#474447, #494340 and #475993) have been fixed some time ago. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=494340#20 There is a problem on ARM the let's uic-qt3 segfault: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=fslview&ver=3.0.2%2B4.1.0-1&arch=arm&stamp=1222355159&file=log This prevented (and still prevents) fslview from moving into testing. I have tagged the bug with 'help', but got none so far. I have no clue what could cause such behavior. AFAIK uic simply generates the sources that will later on be compiled. If it works on one platform it should work on others. Nevertheless, the package that contains all the fixes for the upstream version that is in lenny is still in the archive (in some sense this is now a backport): http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/f/fslview/fslview_3.0+4.0.2-5.dsc Do you want me to prepare an upload of this package to tpu or can it be hinted in an automatic fashion, despite the fact that binary packages for most archs would have to be rebuilt and despite the fact that it probably won't build on ARM? Cheers, Michael -- GPG key: 1024D/3144BE0F Michael Hanke http://apsy.gse.uni-magdeburg.de/hanke ICQ: 48230050
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
