tags 501439 + confirmed thanks On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 01:45:14PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > I don't understand why enabling addons is done with 'amend'. There > should at least be an 'enable' alias.
Agreed. I think the initial "mental process" was that *re*-enabling always happen after a disable action, hence the idea was to amend that action. But yes, you are right, "enable" is a better name. We should just keep "amend" temporarily for backward compatibility. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7 [EMAIL PROTECTED],pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/ I'm still an SGML person,this newfangled /\ All one has to do is hit the XML stuff is so ... simplistic -- Manoj \/ right keys at the right time -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
