On Sat, 6 Sep 2008, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > reassign 498010 base-files > thanks > > Hi, > > policycoreutils already installs the /selinux directory. This > report is not about that -- since policycoreutils is not, and should > not be, essential, people who do not install policycoreutils see an > error message from init about not being able to mount selnuxfs. > > policycoreutils cant help that when it is not installed. > > base-files folks need to determine if that dir should indeed > live on all machines (I see no harm in that), or not, and deal with > this bug accordingly.
Simple question: It is useful or desirable to mount the selinux fs on /selinux when policycoreutils is not installed? If yes, I could agree to add /selinux to base-files. If not, then this would be just an aesthetic issue (that we might want to fix for lenny, anyway). The package trying to mount selinux fs on /selinux (initscripts it seems) should do so only if /selinux exists, so that no error message is shown and the user is not alarmed if /selinux does not exist. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
