Hi all! On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 22:16:28 +0200, Jörg Sommer wrote: > Petter Reinholdtsen schrieb am Thu 21. Aug, 22:11 (+0200): [You = Luca Capello] >> You interpret $all differently from insserv, and it is not obvious to >> me which interpretation is correct. The definition I am aware of for >> $all is: >> >> facility supported by insserv to start a script after all the other >> scripts, at the end of the boot sequence. >> >> The question at work is the priority of $all when there is script X >> depending on a script Y depending on $all. Is X part of 'all the >> other scripts' or not? Should $all have higher priority than other >> dependencies or not? At the moment, insserv consider X to be part of >> 'all the other scripts', and places Y after X. > > To me this sounds wrong. When X says it requires Y to be started, it > needs a service provided by Y. So X must come after Y, otherwise X > fails.
FWIW, fully ACK. However, I don't know the best solution for $all :-( Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca
pgpTN1yN4g3zb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
