Am Samstag, den 09.08.2008, 16:54 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> >
> > It doestn't matter (at least for the lenny release) if this is a bug or
> > if that is intendet, we have to find a solution for this problem.
>
> It worries me that combinations with -git are a problem. -git wasn't handled
> at all before, so if it seems hard to get it right without our current time
> constraints, I'd rather leave it post-lenny.
Right we can leave that -rcN-gitN problem to post lenny :)
> My biggest concern is the regression (in comparison to etch). If we remove
> the greedy 'g' as you proposed, I take it this gives us working code again?
Because we don't need to have a right -rcN-gitN -rcN -gitN ordering, I
suggest we use greedy.
The greedy makes only a difference for this -rcN-gitN (or -preN-gitN,
you get the idea) double problem.
I think it's better to have:
(with greedy)
Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.26-1-amd64
Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.26-1-amd64-rc1
Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.26-1-amd64-rc1-git1
instead of:
(without)
Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.26-1-amd64-rc1-git1
Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.26-1-amd64
Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.26-1-amd64-rc1
Robert, you're Code (with greedy) with dpkg is probable better, then the
one before.
We only have now a problem with the ordering of the same base version,
e.g. in my case vmlinuz-2.6.26-1-amd64
But we don't need to worry anymore about different base versions :)
So for lenny we just use the one you already made, with one little
change I suggest:
a=`echo $a | sed -e "s/~test/~atest/"`
b=`echo $b | sed -e "s/~test/~atest/"`
With such changes we even can reuse our priority system with dpkg :)
the first char(s) after ~ is our priority, in case we need to change it.
If we want to have -test below -rc then we have to :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
