On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 10:06:49PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I would like to state it clearly that library from Tuebingen is completely
> > different from the one by Gilles Debunne. There are no predecessor/successor
> > relation. Only common parts of those libraries is a name and some results
> > which could be achieved by them.
> I am fully aware of that [...]
But the other people may not be :)
> I will have a look at Debunnes library, and if possible will
> also package it. However I would package it under a
> different name, replacing the library with a new
> one with a different api is not really an option, I agree
> with Artur here.
>
> Suggestions for a new name are welcome,
> qglviewer-debunne seems a little overdone :)
>
> As soon as I have some time on my hands I will see to it
> (end of next week I hope)
My unofficial package is named as a libqglviewer-gd, where gd stands for Gilles
Debunne. I exchanged some emails with Gilles and he proposed lib3dviewer.
I've written an email to him today asking if he is going to change the
upstream name or it is only suggestion for Debian package.
There is one more problem which needs to be clarified. Version numbering
scheme for this library is a.b.c-d, but tarball naming convention contains
only a.b.c part. So if you look into current libQGLViewer-1.3.9.tar.gz
(containing 1.3.9-6) it differs from libQGLViewer-1.3.9.tar.gz fetched two
month ago (it contained 1.3.9-4). I also mention it in my email.
I'll notify you as soon as I will get the reply.
Regards
Artur
--
<Agg> Nie wiem co to jest, ale deklaracje charsetu wpierdala...
/o listarze/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
