tag 493837 pending
thanks

> gscan2pdf depends on libsane, presumably because it requires scanimage.

It depends on libsane and sane-utils, and I agree that the libsane
dependency is useless but harmless. I'll fix this with the next
upstream release.

> scanimage is provided by sane-utils, not by libsane; libsane only recommends
> sane-utils, so you should make gscan2pdf depend on sane-utils rather than
> libsane.

What happened to sane (i.e. sane-frontends)? sid has 1.0.14, rather
than 1.0.19. I am interested because for some scanners, scanadf seems
to work better than scanimage (and therefore gscan2pdf offers support
for both).

Thanks for the report

Jeff



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to