Hi Andrew, On Tuesday 22 July 2008 17:25:37 Andrew Baumann wrote: > Hi Kel, > > On Tuesday 22 July 2008 08:29:29 Kel Modderman wrote: > > Is wireless interface in a bridge? > > No, it's not. The relevant stanza from /etc/network/interfaces is: > > iface ath0 inet static > madwifi-base wifi0 > madwifi-mode ap > wireless-channel 9 > wireless-essid foo > address 192.168.0.1 > netmask 255.255.255.0 > > For the record, hostapd.conf has: > interface=ath0 > driver=madwifi > ssid=foo > country_code=CH > hw_mode=g > channel=9 > beacon_int=100 > dtim_period=2 > max_num_sta=255 > rts_threshold=2347 > fragm_threshold=2346 > macaddr_acl=0 > auth_algs=3 > ignore_broadcast_ssid=0 > wme_enabled=1 > wme_ac_bk_cwmin=4 > wme_ac_bk_cwmax=10 > wme_ac_bk_aifs=7 > wme_ac_bk_txop_limit=0 > wme_ac_bk_acm=0 > wme_ac_be_aifs=3 > wme_ac_be_cwmin=4 > wme_ac_be_cwmax=10 > wme_ac_be_txop_limit=0 > wme_ac_be_acm=0 > wme_ac_vi_aifs=2 > wme_ac_vi_cwmin=3 > wme_ac_vi_cwmax=4 > wme_ac_vi_txop_limit=94 > wme_ac_vi_acm=0 > wme_ac_vo_aifs=2 > wme_ac_vo_cwmin=2 > wme_ac_vo_cwmax=3 > wme_ac_vo_txop_limit=47 > wme_ac_vo_acm=0 > eapol_key_index_workaround=0 > eap_server=0 > own_ip_addr=127.0.0.1 > wpa=1 > wpa_passphrase=bar > wpa_key_mgmt=WPA-PSK > wpa_pairwise=TKIP CCMP > wpa_group_rekey=600
My working configuration is very similar, except I have disabled WME completely. Could you try commenting out all wme configuration key/values? > > > I had no problem setting up ath0 in ap mode using hostapd for wpa2 auth, > > using current madwifi + hostapd packages, dnsmasq for DNS + dhcp and > > iptables script for NAT of ethernet connection. > > Well, I'm using dhcp3-server and bind, but this seems to be a lower-level > problem. It seems only to have directly affected the squeezebox stuff (my > laptop is still able to connect), which is odd, but looking at packet > captures I see a lot of short packets and other weirdness, which leads me to > suspect that the new version is corrupting or dropping packets. Understood. > > > Regressions like this really suck. Sadly if we go back to 0.9.4 many users > > have no hardware support at all... And its crunch time for Lenny release... > > I guess I'll just have to hang onto 0.9.4 for now and hope they figure it out > eventually upstream. Let's hope ath5k/ath9k improve rapidly. Thanks, Kel. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
