On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 02:16 +0100, Anand Kumria wrote: > Yes - I think it should be renamed. > > I think the transition steps should be: > - this release: have bazaar depend upon bzr > - next release: have a baz package, and a pseudo package that depends > upon both 'baz' and 'bzr' > - next release++: remove the bazaar package
I have an alternative procedure. - this release: switch from bazaar to baz, with bazaar being a dummy package that depends on baz. What do you think. Once we are past this release we can discuss what the "bazaar" package should be. Thanks, James -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
