On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Stephane Chazelas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 09:10:00AM +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote: > [...] >> >> > I think it should be worth mentionning that since 2.6.16, on >> >> > some architectures, the kernel can be configured with high >> >> > resolution timers which makes nanosleep(2) a lot more accurate >> >> > and voids the first comment above. >> >> I've certainly verified this in 2.6.26-rc6. The question is exactly >> when the change came about. > [...] > > Hi Michael, > > See: > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=6ba1b91213e81aa92b5cf7539f7d2a94ff54947c
Thanks -- I did eventually verify when the change occurred by looking at old source tree. -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ man-pages online: http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online_pages.html Found a bug? http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/reporting_bugs.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
