On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 10:56:47AM +0200, Nicolas Deschildre wrote: > I'm setting severity to normal, as port conflict is quite common (e.g. > the HTTP servers). But I don't think we should make it as conflicting
The port conflict was not the reason for setting the severity to serious, but the failing installation was. If you think that such port conflicts are quite common, it becomes even more important to prevent the package installation from failing on this. I personally think that lowering the severity on this bug is a major mistake - especially if, as you state yourself, the installation failure is expected to appear often. However, I leave it up to you to increase the severity back to it's native state for such bugs. Mario -- <jv> Oh well, config <jv> one actually wonders what force in the universe is holding it <jv> and makes it working <Beeth> chances and accidents :)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
