* Jan Christoph Nordholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-03 15:02:12 CEST]: > screen (4.0.3-10) unstable; urgency=low > . > * The "Whoa, this feels like a time machine" release. > * Apply ~5k lines of unified diff to the source (CVS HEAD against > last release). Closes: #444146.
There are several questions raised by this upload: ## DP: Diff between 4.0.3 and CVS HEAD (checked out on 2008/06/01). -) Was this pull from upstream cvs discussed with upstream developers? I am asking this explicitly with respect to the stability of that snapshot and the upcoming lenny release. -) How much of a help is this new feature with respect to the regressions it introduces (both already known one (#484647, #485532, #485925) and maybe others not yet noticed)? I took a look at the CVS, last commit was last year february. That can mean several things, but most propably: Unfinished work lying around which can mean several stranger breakages, otherwise I would have expected a release in the meantime. So I really would like to know how much you've invested into scanning those ~5k lines about their stability and release saveness for the upcoming lenny release? screen unfortunately is not a joe random package and I rather like to raise the concerns now instead of stumbling into more serious problems later. Thanks in advance for your answers, Rhonda -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
