On Mi, 11 Jun 2008, Jonathan Kew wrote:
> So for Debian, that's not a concern; you'll always be using
> xdvipdfmx. However, I don't recall offhand whether there were any
> significant bug-fixes in xdvipdfmx that you'd need in order for this
> to actually work, or if it's always been supported if you had a
> suitable xetex.def.
Ok, fine with me. So in any way there will be no regression but at least
a partial improvement. I will give it a try.
Thanks again for all your work and all the best
Best wishes
Norbert
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Vienna University of Technology
Debian Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian TeX Group
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ford had his own code of ethics. It wasn't much of one,
but it was his and he stuck by it, more or less. One rule
he made was never to buy his own drinks. He wasn't sure if
that counted as an ethic, but you have to go with what
you've got.
--- Douglas Adams, The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
