On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 11:07:33AM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > Am Freitag, den 06.06.2008, 09:43 +0200 schrieb Guido Günther: > > On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 09:15:23AM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > > > fatal: Not a valid object name upstream/0.2.902+svn570 > > > xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.2.902+svn570.orig.tar.gz does not exist, > > > creating from 'upstream' > > > fatal: Not a valid object name upstream > > You need to help git-buildpackage to figure out where to build the > > orig.tar.gz from: > > > > git-buildpackage --git-debian-branch=debian-unstable > > --git-upstream-branch=origin/upstream-unstable > > That did the trick. I finally got it to work with not signing the > package with > > git-buildpackage --git-debian-branch=debian-unstable > --git-upstream-branch=origin/upstream-unstable --git-builder=debuild -i\.git > -I.git -us -uc Isn't: git-buildpackage --git-debian-branch=debian-unstable --git-upstream-branch=origin/upstream-unstable -us -uc enough? Why do you need these extra options. Basically you shouldn't otherwise it'd be a bug in git-buildpackage.
> I will publish this on [1]. Maybe you can add an example, since I got > confused in the manual, because I did not want to add a dsc-file into > git or import an upstream source. Or is git.debian.org considered > upstream? Well the manual mostly talks about getting your debian packages into git version control, it maybe lacks some examples for people who "only" want to build from a published repo. I'll add that. -- Guido -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
