Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This is already fixed in my package. Each new name packages (without > cvs in package name) conflicts/replaces the old packages name (with > cvs in package name). Example with libavcodec51 : > > ,---- > | $ apt-cache show libavcodec51 > | Package: libavcodec51 > | Priority: optional > | Section: libs > | Installed-Size: 3952 > | Maintainer: Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > | Architecture: i386 > | Source: ffmpegcvs > | Version: 3:20080531-0.1 > | Replaces: libavcodeccvs51 > | > | Conflicts: libavcodeccvs51 > `----
I see. Well, this means that we could probably do the same in the debian package then. May I ask you why you decided to go away from the naming 'libavcodeccvs51' to 'libavcodec51'? Having your package names introduce 'cvs' was a good indication that the package originated from you in bugreports. -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
