Robert Millan wrote: > Sounds ok, but I don't have time to look into this at the moment. A patch > would be welcome.
IMHO it's important to consider how triggers would handle a situation such as an apt run that removed the running kernel added a new kernel, and then failed. In this case, the grub trigger might not run, which would leave a menu.lst that contained only a nonexistent kernel. (This is also potentially a problem with the initramfs-tools triggers, I guess..) Note that ubuntu has triggerised grub; I don't know how/if they deal with that case. -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature