On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 11:30:05PM +0200, Agustin Martin wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 03:13:41PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Package: aspell
> > 
> > Many aspell dictionaries depend on the libaspell15 package. with the
> > next soversion (or the coming C++ ABI change), the package name has to
> > be changed, as well as other 24 dictionary packages. That's just a
> > maintainance burden. Package dictionaries may depend on aspell (>=
> > 0.60) instead, but you may argue, that the aspell binary isn't
> > necessarily needed. Proposing:
> > 
> > - a new libaspell package, which depends on the current libaspell15
> >   package (a provides is not enough, because dictionaries have to
> >   depend on an version, and versioned provides don't yet exist)
> > 
> > - alternatively dictionary packages should depend on aspell.
> > 
> > - a short paragraph in README.Debian as a mini policy.
> 
> Just to note that after Brian suggestion, one of the things that are waiting
> in dictionaries-common for sarge release is aspell-autobuidhash, allowing the
> binary hashes being built from dict postinst. This is still very
> experimental, and would require for dicts using it that not only libaspellxx
> is installed but also aspell-bin, but should make dependencies simpler for
> those dicts, since the dependency would be on aspell-bin, which is synced to
> the appropriate libaspellxx because it depends on it.

Yeah, what he said.  

Couple questions:

Matthias: How soon will the C++ ABI transition start?  Or, in other
words, how long do we have to implement the autobuildhash for all of the
dictionaries before the libaspell name will have to change?

Agustin: What's the status of aspell-autobuildhash?  I'd like to start
seriously testing it very soon, within the next couple of weeks, so that
we can start transitioning the dictionary packages as soon as sarge
releases.

-- 
Society is never going to make any progress until we all learn to
pretend to like each other.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to